Skip to Content

Former NFT Project “Wonders of The First” Pivots to Physical CCG Amid Pricing and Art Concerns

Former NFT Project “Wonders of The First” Pivots to Physical CCG Amid Pricing and Art Concerns

Wonders of The First, a new Collectible Card Game (CCG) that has recently debuted on Kickstarter, is drawing significant attention not only for its crowdfunding success but also for the numerous concerns raised by backers and observers alike. Despite achieving a current pledge amount of $846,461, far surpassing its $25,000 goal, the project is mired in controversy, particularly around its pivot from a previously planned NFT project to a physical card game.

Originally conceived as an NFT-based game, Wonders of The First has rebranded itself in the physical realm as NFTs have waned in popularity. However, this shift has not alleviated doubts about the game’s legitimacy and value. Backers have expressed concerns about the use of AI-generated art, which many claim lacks cohesion and appears derivative of established games like Magic: The Gathering. This has raised eyebrows about both the originality and the aesthetic quality of the game’s design.

Additionally, the price point of the game has become a hot-button issue. Priced at $150 per box, which includes 9 cards per pack plus a bonus card, the game stands out as one of the most expensive on the market. This pricing strategy is especially controversial given that the game boasts over 400 cards in its Alpha set, suggesting that collectors might need to purchase an excessive number of boxes to obtain a complete set. Comparatively, other popular card games like Lorcana and Digimon offer more cards per pack at a lower price, providing better value to players and collectors.

One backer articulated the community’s frustration, questioning the sustainability of a business model that seems designed more for profit than for fostering a player community: “First, the concept of not reprinting cards after the print cycle is already bad news… You want this to be community driven… After printing, the prices are going to skyrocket. This is a red flag.”

Moreover, the game’s strategy of restricting reprints could create a speculative market where only the earliest and wealthiest backers benefit, potentially alienating new players and those unable to invest heavily from the outset. Such a model raises questions about the game’s commitment to inclusivity and its long-term viability in the competitive CCG landscape.

gongo

Tuesday 7th of May 2024

LOL @ this comment section being brigaded by psychos from their discord. they get like this everywhere whenever someone threatens their "investment"

G

Saturday 4th of May 2024

Wow this comment section is cancer. Its all chatgpt nonesense

James

Monday 6th of May 2024

@G, Things a bot would say for $200 Alex!

Vince

Thursday 2nd of May 2024

Lol you can tell in the comments who's trying to defend very specific verbiage about wonders. It wasn't originally a game so they claim false news but don't deny that it was an nft project before this.

James

Monday 6th of May 2024

@Mudgeo, the Collectors proofs are on the blockchain for proof of ownership. The game itself and playing it is exclusive of all that.

GFL

Monday 6th of May 2024

@Vince, both links are for the same thing. The Collector’s proofs tied to IP rights which are on blockchain to prove ownership. If you don’t care about IP rights…..etc. then it doesn’t matter. The game itself and playing it is exclusive of that.

Mudgeo

Saturday 4th of May 2024

@Vince, lollll. You are a hero. “It wasn’t an nft “ is refuted with one link. Doesn’t matter how much money it makes, people don’t pay until the Kickstarter is over. I raised 50k and ended up with about 44 when people dropped out or didn’t pay. A lot can happen in the next few weeks and if you look at ads on social media this thing is getting ripped apart because of how many scam Red flags it is giving off.

Anon

Thursday 2nd of May 2024

@Vince, the game was always a physical game. Yes, there are also character proofs that were minted on the Ethereum blockchain, and there is some historical significance to the block that the proofs were minted on. That said, those are only relevant to people who choose to care about them and they have zero to do with the physical card game.

With respect to the lack of reprints, that’s a philosophical difference of opinion. If one does not want to collect or “speculate” in future value then they do not have to. If one wants to build a set but is concerned that they will eventually become too expensive, then the options are either buy now or don’t. There are no guarantees at all that the cards will be worth more in the future, if anything that’s quite a lofty assumption. If they are too expensive for a writer of table top gaming news, well I want a private jet but I’m not writing blogs about how I can’t afford one.

Vince

Thursday 2nd of May 2024

Ah, used the wrong word again. Sorry not NFT game but NFT collection, don't roast me on that one.

Outsider

Thursday 2nd of May 2024

Funny how all these posts say "do better" and that the writer needs to do "research"...

Sounds like a scam to me.

Derek

Wednesday 1st of May 2024

Whoever wrote this is truly daft. What a grifter