<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Confrontation Guard Unit and Attachment previews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903</link>
	<description>Daily news, reviews and information for tabletop gamers of all interests.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zomboner</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25356</link>
		<dc:creator>Zomboner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25356</guid>
		<description>Trent, I don't know if these are production or not, but I've heard the term "production masters" tossed around ie, possibly they are the models on which the production paint jobs are based...  just a theory.

I think they look good for ppp.  I wouldn't be surprised to see them popping up in D&#38;D games and such (they'll do much better than the mage knight minis we currently use =P)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trent, I don&#8217;t know if these are production or not, but I&#8217;ve heard the term &#8220;production masters&#8221; tossed around ie, possibly they are the models on which the production paint jobs are based&#8230;  just a theory.</p>
<p>I think they look good for ppp.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see them popping up in D&amp;D games and such (they&#8217;ll do much better than the mage knight minis we currently use =P)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25354</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25354</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;fee_weasel&lt;/strong&gt; wrote:&lt;blockquote&gt;I never was a fan of Alahan but I do like the looks of these minis. &lt;/blockquote&gt;Being prepainted makes me like them :-) After the Cynwall the Lions were the most frightening to paint IMO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>fee_weasel</strong> wrote:<br />
<blockquote>I never was a fan of Alahan but I do like the looks of these minis. </p></blockquote>
<p>Being prepainted makes me like them :-) After the Cynwall the Lions were the most frightening to paint IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fee_weasel</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25353</link>
		<dc:creator>fee_weasel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25353</guid>
		<description>I never was a fan of Alahan but I do like the looks of these minis. AT-43 and Hybrid are my Rackham games of choice but I might have to look into CAOR because of these and the Dirz.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never was a fan of Alahan but I do like the looks of these minis. AT-43 and Hybrid are my Rackham games of choice but I might have to look into CAOR because of these and the Dirz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottywan82</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25348</link>
		<dc:creator>scottywan82</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25348</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure if I love or hate the color scheme they picked for everyone.  It could be very cool, but I worry it will look ridiculous on the tabletop...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I love or hate the color scheme they picked for everyone.  It could be very cool, but I worry it will look ridiculous on the tabletop&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent McCaffrey</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25334</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent McCaffrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/07/23/15903#comment-25334</guid>
		<description>Again, I can only guess that those must be production minis.  Or perhaps they're production minis that have been cleaned up a bit?  The pre-painted detail is way better than (eg) D&#38;D minis which makes me think that they got special attention.  But the attachment box standard bearer has just enough spilt ink on his weapon that they couldn't possibly be studio painted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, I can only guess that those must be production minis.  Or perhaps they&#8217;re production minis that have been cleaned up a bit?  The pre-painted detail is way better than (eg) D&amp;D minis which makes me think that they got special attention.  But the attachment box standard bearer has just enough spilt ink on his weapon that they couldn&#8217;t possibly be studio painted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
