<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: July AT-43 previews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145</link>
	<description>Daily news, reviews and information for tabletop gamers of all interests.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aftermath</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18766</link>
		<dc:creator>Aftermath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18766</guid>
		<description>@Osbad: As a note, the rear guns on the King Mammoth are flame throwers, so arcing fire with them would make some sense by the laws of physics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Osbad: As a note, the rear guns on the King Mammoth are flame throwers, so arcing fire with them would make some sense by the laws of physics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osbad</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18754</link>
		<dc:creator>Osbad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18754</guid>
		<description>@p-ko: But these are ground-attack craft/skimmers, and the rear-facing guns are meant to engage troops on the ground, not incoming fighters.  They are not really aircraft as such.  

I'm not hyperventilating over this, they are nice models, I just can't get my head around any sort of logic for them.  Although the sculpting and painting is nice.

I played a game last night against my mate's new Karmans and the Easy Trike is an awesome model.  I'm sure this one will be awesome too, I just can't force its equipment into any sort of "logic" as even though this is a fantasy game, it's still supposed to comply with the real world's laws of physics... :s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@p-ko: But these are ground-attack craft/skimmers, and the rear-facing guns are meant to engage troops on the ground, not incoming fighters.  They are not really aircraft as such.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not hyperventilating over this, they are nice models, I just can&#8217;t get my head around any sort of logic for them.  Although the sculpting and painting is nice.</p>
<p>I played a game last night against my mate&#8217;s new Karmans and the Easy Trike is an awesome model.  I&#8217;m sure this one will be awesome too, I just can&#8217;t force its equipment into any sort of &#8220;logic&#8221; as even though this is a fantasy game, it&#8217;s still supposed to comply with the real world&#8217;s laws of physics&#8230; :s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P-ko</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18750</link>
		<dc:creator>P-ko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 10:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18750</guid>
		<description>Osbad- because real world heavy airplanes never had tail gunners?;)
i like the design, although both sources of inspiration, Last Exile and BLAME! are painfully obvious in this monkey-mobile:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Osbad- because real world heavy airplanes never had tail gunners?;)<br />
i like the design, although both sources of inspiration, Last Exile and BLAME! are painfully obvious in this monkey-mobile:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a_thousand_hats</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18748</link>
		<dc:creator>a_thousand_hats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18748</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;as for the other points, I agree but it’s worth bearing in mind that we’re trying to discuss how realistic an anti-grav vehicle for a race of space gorillas is ;-)&lt;/i&gt;

Wadda'ya mean? it isn't real? ;-P

I love the Red Blok machine - I don't own or play AT43 but it's seriously pressuring my 'new toy craving' as the months go by.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>as for the other points, I agree but it’s worth bearing in mind that we’re trying to discuss how realistic an anti-grav vehicle for a race of space gorillas is ;-)</i></p>
<p>Wadda&#8217;ya mean? it isn&#8217;t real? ;-P</p>
<p>I love the Red Blok machine - I don&#8217;t own or play AT43 but it&#8217;s seriously pressuring my &#8216;new toy craving&#8217; as the months go by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18745</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18745</guid>
		<description>The empty seats are supposed to be filled in the final model - as for the other points, I agree but it's worth bearing in mind that we're trying to discuss how realistic an anti-grav vehicle for a race of space gorillas is ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The empty seats are supposed to be filled in the final model - as for the other points, I agree but it&#8217;s worth bearing in mind that we&#8217;re trying to discuss how realistic an anti-grav vehicle for a race of space gorillas is ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osbad</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18744</link>
		<dc:creator>Osbad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18744</guid>
		<description>Nice walker.

'King Mammoth looks nice but strangely unfunctional - backwards facing guns, empty "co pilot" seat, whoppingly unbalanced gun on one side.  Its nicely styled, but just looks completely impractical!

Who can fathom the brain of a gorilla eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice walker.</p>
<p>&#8216;King Mammoth looks nice but strangely unfunctional - backwards facing guns, empty &#8220;co pilot&#8221; seat, whoppingly unbalanced gun on one side.  Its nicely styled, but just looks completely impractical!</p>
<p>Who can fathom the brain of a gorilla eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axhead</title>
		<link>http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18722</link>
		<dc:creator>Axhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 00:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tabletopgamingnews.com/2008/03/13/13145#comment-18722</guid>
		<description>All of the Red Block walkers sing sweet songs of love to me!  I don't even play AT-43 and I already own a couple :)

On the other hand that King Mamoth looks like it was designed by monkeys... oh wait a sec...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the Red Block walkers sing sweet songs of love to me!  I don&#8217;t even play AT-43 and I already own a couple :)</p>
<p>On the other hand that King Mamoth looks like it was designed by monkeys&#8230; oh wait a sec&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
