• RSS Feeds
  • Login
  • Register
  • Confrontation, prepaints and the future of gaming

    Editorial

    The newly released Confrontation prepainted plastic figures will, it is said in various sectors of the Interweb, not only lead to the end of Rackham as a company but also spell the end of gaming as we know it. At least that is what various posters on message boards and forums are saying.

    The internet is great in that it allows you to connect to hundreds of people with similar interests and it is a poor communication medium in that it allows, some might say induces, people to yell the most inane things in the hope of being noticed. Separating the signal from the noise is often difficult to do.

    The internet also seems to fear change. Or at least view it as an opportunity to wail and moan about the end of the earth, the end of the hobby, the end of… well the end of almost anything. This isn’t to say that there aren’t people with legitimate complaints and that there aren’t companies that act in ways that are mystifying to gamers. Rackham is certainly an example.

    Now here at TGN one of our broad goals is to expose gamers to new products, games, genres and minis in the hope of not only helping people find fun new games but also to try to broaden the hobby in general. Its good to have high goals. It always make me happy to see someone post that they haven’t seen a game or a miniature range before and I always hope that this results in someone finding a new avenue in which to explore the hobby.

    But I do not at any point delude myself into thinking that people playing Weird War games, Pulp sci-fi skirmish scenarios and 2mm WWII games are anything other than a small part of this hobby. For the record, my recent painting has been for Battletech, Weird WWII and pirate gaming so I’m certainly not in the mainstream in any sense. But the hobby needs to have popular, mainstream games that are produced with big ad budgets to keep gamers coming into the hobby. Especially if the hobby is going to compete with video games and products like World of Warcraft.

    Rackham has aspirations to be a player as large as GW. And it can’t do that without a lot of money and without having the same sort of retail presence that GW does. Games Workshop created their own retail presence by opening their own shops. Rackham obviously can’t do this and so it is creating gaming products that are aimed at mass market stores. Hence their packaging and the prepainted and plastic minis. Rackham needs to move these products into Wal Marts and mass market toy stores to try to get the same number of eyeballs aimed at the product as GW does.

    Now all of the “serious” gamers on the net can deride this, and many do. And some gamers, myself included, are slightly miffed at Rackham for making a Confrontation game that doesn’t have an upgrade path for Confrontation v3 gamers.

    But I want to let you in on a secret. The three most popular sets of pages on TGN are the 40K and AT-43 category pages and any page that relates to the release of the new Confrontation game. Three of the top ten pages at TGN this month are posts about the Confrontation starter and starter set figures. We all appear to cry and moan and about the new Confrontation game and yet we all want information about it. And apparently can’t get enough of it. We’re a funny lot aren’t we?

    This is hardly new though. For all the people that complain about 40K and WFB there are just as many secret, and not-so-secret 40K and WFB players. Ultimately we all like having fun and playing a rousing game with our minis and this will lead some of us that are complaining about the new Confrontation to pick it up when it comes out and play it despite our earlier critiques.

    I am going to step out on a limb and say that I think that the upcoming Confrontation game will, if Rackham can successfully navigate their financial issues, be more popular than Confrontation v3 was and will sell in numbers that are multiple factors of their old metal miniature sales. And I think that as gamers while we may or may not find the idea of a prepainted plastic miniature game compelling should look at this as an opportunity to expand the base of gamers in our area. A new player interested in Confrontation v4 is a potential new Supersystem, AE-WWII or Legends of the Old West gamer. Or at the very least they are a new customer for your friendly local game store and more money in their pockets means that its easier for them to support niche gaming products like pirates, pulp minis and German War Apes.

    41 Responses to “Confrontation, prepaints and the future of gaming”


    briguy says:

    One wonders whether Rackham’s desire to emulate GW is a good thing, given the direction that GW appears to be heading. It seems to me that this hobby is just not “big” enough to allow a company to become a huge multinational that is a cash cow.

    That said though, I agree with you. I wish Rackham all the best success, even though I don’t play any of their games and likely won’t, because it means more people more likely to join me playing Supersystem! (notice how I worked that in? :-))


    Zac says:

    One wonders whether Rackham’s desire to emulate GW is a good thing

    I don’t think Rackham do. I just think that Rckham want to be a mass market game company and that invites comparisions to GW but they are doing so in a much different manner than GW. Its a very surface comparision at best.

    I think that there is probably quite a lot of room for another company like GW in the hobby. Lets not forget that GW pales in comparison to companies like Hasbro which produce a lot of gaming material.

    All GW or Rackham need to do is take a chunk of the sales away from games like D&D Miniatures, HeroClix, Heroscape or similar products and they can make a good living.


    LarkinVain says:

    I hope these prepaints do open the way for more new blood in the hobby. I myself am a product of prepainted that has gone the way to metal minis. It was Heroclix that brought me into the world of miniature gaming. This then lead me to Mage Knight which then led me to Mech Warrior which then lead me to Warhammer 40K. It was Warmachine though that really sparked my interest in metal miniatures and painting. I never could wrap my head around the rules of 40k, but my first demo of Warmachine instantly clicked in my mind.

    That led me to other games such as Dark Age and Rezolution. And thanks to TNG lead me wonderful games such as Anima Tactics, Hell Dorado and AE-WWII.

    Wizkids games I believe is the first to bring miniature wargames to the mainstream but I have a feeling they are failing at that. While I do see their Priates Games on the shelves of large retail stores I no longer see the HeroClix boosters. It seems to me they have gone full circle and now do these “brick and mortar” incentives instead.

    If Rackham intends to compete in the mass retail market I believe their biggest competitor would be Heroscape. Heroscape is a very popular miniatures game that is very simple to learn and relatively cheap to get into. They are the first prepainted miniatures game as of late to drop the blind package method. While their sculpts an paint jobs are no where near the quality of AT-43 they are very popular among their target market and even gamers. (Just by checking the Herosapers.com and boardgame geek).

    If Confrontation or AT-43 happen to be on the shelves of Wal-Mart or Toys R Us I believe most regular consumers will pass if they are see it side by side Heroscape. AT-43 starter set $80. Heroscape Starter set $40. AT-43 you get some containers and walls. Heroscape you get walls and modular terrain. AT-43 you get 19 miniatures. Heroscape you get 30. Although the quality in the games and miniatures greatly differ I don’t believe Rackham has or can priced themselves to cater mass consumers. Not right now at least.

    I do think that the new Confrontation will be successful because there is a market among gamers for their miniatures. I know lots of gamers that simply have no time to paint and love the concept of prepainted. A lot of them hate to buy things blind packaged and welcomes the what you see is what you get form of distribution.

    As for me, I’m a gaming junkie. I will buy the new Confrontation and try it out. :)


    Phillip says:

    I seem to remember reading various Rackham annual reports over the past few years along with the document when they floated.

    The directors kept emphasising how they were going to emulate GW.

    How times change!


    Zac says:

    When Rackham says it, it doesn’t mean the same thing typical that it means when gamers say it online. Rackham means it as a sales goal and gamers mean it in a derogatory sense.

    Rackham is clearly not following GWs model though. Different types of games, different market focus as well I think.

    I’m certain Rackham won’t mind eating some GW sales but they are probably aiming at the Heroscape market more than the 40K market.


    altfritz says:

    Well I can’t think of any historical miniatures companies that are going to be affected , so “gaming as I know it” is unlikely to be affected. Even in fantasy gaming I doubt there will be much change. Don’t Rackham’s sculptors move on after a few years already? So those that did all the initial work that got Rackham it’s artsy rep have already gone. Many of the newer sculpts are not that good and the original sculptors are probably working for other people. I know some people look to Rackham for wierd and wonderful sculpts, but there are lots of companies coming on board to fill the void as Rackhma goes plastic only. IMO.


    oldsalt says:

    I paint ALL of my figs, always have, prob always will.

    But I love Rackham’s AT-43 and New Confrontationfor the same reason.

    I HATE playing with or against unpainted armies!

    I will almost certainly apply touch ups if not outright repaint
    all my new Rackham Figs… but I think prepaints are the future
    because.. not everyone likes to paint.. and this open’s a lot of new blood for me to play against (and too introduce miniature gaming too)
    with out looking crappy on the table (sorry heroclix)


    Morf says:

    I agree with all of the Editorial’s points.
    I’ve been always surprised with the fact that when some people
    move away from GW games into ones less popular = more niche, they suddenly start looking down at most of the players that did not go through the “illumination”.

    Let GW and Rackham carry the torch and light the way for people that never would have learnt about miniature games if not for the giants presence in the supermalls and city landscape. Good for them, good for us.


    Trent McCaffrey says:

    I’m short on time, not cash. Good quality pre-paints with a deep rules system fills the niche for me.

    It will also keep new parents, including our dear TGN editor, in the hobby. Previously, having a kid was a death sentence for the gaming collection, at least until they 6 years old or so. I’m sure many that have left the hobby for that reason never seem to find the time to come back.


    Trent McCaffrey says:

    Although I hope the Rackham stuff never hits the shelves of Walmart. It would lead to a boom-bust for the company. Slow sustainable grow is much healthier.


    LarkinVain says:

    A\s a parent of a 2 year old I have to agree with you. That’s why I love Heroscape and AT-43. Heroscape my daughter can actually play around with. AT-43 gives me the deeper rules I want. It also leads me to the trend of playing low count model games such as Anima Tactics (I can handle to paint 2 minis a month) and Hell Dorado (finished my Sarrasins starter in 1 week, only 10 models). For now the only large scale games that I will take time to paint is warmachine and hordes.


    roberious says:

    My own presonal believe is that Rackham is taking advantage of the prepaint technology. From what I can read, Jean Bey believes that this is a good move for the company and that the product will be very popular to both the gamers and hobbiest alike. Many of the prepaints distributed by Hasbro/wizards of the Coast are massive sellers and if you can bring these players into the tabletop gaming hobby you’l have quite the clientel.

    I am a huge GW fan, Grey Knight for the company and play all of their games regularly but like all gamers I love new stuff. So my collection includes, Warmachine, Hordes, AT-43, Confrontation, Wargods of Eagytus and many others. I love to paint minis, assemble platic tank kits, make converstions but I mainly love to play and being able to unpack a game and play it right from the box is quite a luxury. It won’t take me away from painting, on the contrary it will give me more time for many of the projects I have been working on.

    Rackham will continiue to make some of the best metal and now resin mini’s in the world but also provides us with ready to play, nicely prepainted figs. I think this move also sets Rackham apart from many of the other miniature games comapnies and it’s a sound move. I am sure it will pay off for Rackham and may even push other companies into new directions. One thing I would love to see is GW make and design new games rather then just add more to the existing big three.

    They have some great games designers, Jervis Johnson, Rick Priestley and others who could probably spit out new product with ease. I digress, but I do think Rackham will do fine and continue to provide new and exiting gaming products to us, the players, who always want something different and easily grow tired of old toys.


    yslaire says:

    The main issue about Rackham is not the games, though there is an evident lack in rule designing… AT-43 and Confrontation AoR tried to solve the “rule design issue” but in some way, by symplifiing and standardizing the game they loose originallity.

    It would be hasardous to compare AT-43 (I have it!) Confrontation AoR with games such as Warmachine, Hordes or Hell Dorado … But despite this, they’re still enjoyable to play, prepainted or not, for players who have trouble to find time to “set the table and engage the ennemy” ;o)

    The future of Rackham has been hypothecated due to the poorest communication policies ever seen in the hobby (except maybe with GW?), the poorest hability to listen to their customers and the poorest hability to question the way they were running their business (mainly due to an obvious ego problem at the direction of the company)… I hope not ; but I think AoR and At-43 came very late to compensate years of abuse.

    Rackham is not the hobby and the eventual death of Rackham should not be the death of the hobby… Hope this will lead to an improvement of the way companies deal with their public and encourage companies respecting their customers and playing a fair game ;o)


    LarkinVain says:

    On a side note… God forbid if anything Rackham shows up on the shelves of Wal*Mart. Nothing against Wal*Mart, but if my wife happens to stumble upon an AT-43 starter there and see’s the $80.00 price tag, she will put 2 and 2 together and realize just how much I’ve spent on AT-43. The great part about getting them at the LGS is she never bothers to go in with me.


    iratesquirrel says:

    Given Rackham’s distribution issues, there is no way they could swing a Wal Mart. I am saddened to see them move into prepaints because I loved the artistry that went into their sculpts. But AT43 has been a good crossover game for boardgamers, roleplayers and minis players who want a 2nd game but don’t have the time. The sculpts are quality and easily repainted. If Rackham really wants to get going in a market they need to actually have coherent army book and miniature releases instead of the haphazard methods they now employ and to keep things in stock!


    syr8766 says:

    A confession: I play with prepaints.

    I picked up Mageknight back when it came out as a little ‘beer and pretzels’ type game to play between games of 40k, or as a board-type game with the wife. Heroclix soon followed as, again, a ‘beer and pretzels’ experience with friends when we were burned out on 40k or D&D. While I don’t own any, my D&D buddies use the prepainted plastics a lot, because while some people are mad enough to paint up 3 large tackleboxes full of reaper figs for D&D, it really is just easier to use the prepaints, especially when you don’t care about the collectible aspect of the game.

    This is not to say I don’t love painting miniatures; I have 4 fully painted factions for Warmachine and Hordes, 3 fully painted factions for Chainmail (so yes, I love my obscure/dead games as well), fully painted Reven for Warlord, scores of one-offs and GW figs converted and painted, and am working on some ACW union for GASLIGHT right now. But I think there’s a place for the prepainted miniature, if done well.

    There are times I want to be able to pick up the game and play. I don’t want to worry about storage, display of figs, etc. I don’t want to spend a year getting said army up to snuff. There is a place in my gaming life for games–and gaming pieces–that are meant for more of a board-gamish experience.

    The problem with prepaints, as I see it, is not that they’re prepaints. It’s the quality of the rules (and from what I understand, AT43’s are fantastic, as are BFE, though the figures are pants), and whether there’s a need to buy more figs or not. I could see myself picking up some Red Blok and Karmans, and then being done, not getting any more expansions etc. Keep ‘em in a box and play ‘em whenever we’re looking to mix things up, or have a quick game between games of something else.

    And really, what’s the difference between prepaints or playing a game where someone’s painted all the figs for both sides up already, which seems to happen a lot these days (as a way of making sure one has an opponent)?

    I don’t know if this means Rackham will succeed or fail; as iratesquirrel pointed out, it seems that companies do well when they keep to their release schedule and put out a quality product on time and with consistency. If they can do that with AT43 and Confrontation, they’ll probably do just fine.


    Mocaiv says:

    AT-43 is an okay game, I got into it as something different from what I usually buy (and paint). The rules are a bit basic, squad based restrictions are something I am not keen on.

    The new Confrontation rules do not inspire me. I actually like C3, so whilst the prepainted minis are okay, I don’t fancy the game much. Hence I have been buying up Rackham lead before it is all gone!

    One problem I have with plastic prepaints is the soft plastic and the bendy swords. Even some of the guns in AT-43 are a bit bendy, how the heck is this going to affect Griffin Duelists for example with their very slim blades?


    Cadfan says:

    You’ll never see me playing with prepaints, simply because painting is the best part of this hobby for me.

    I’m not disappointed that Rackham decided to launch a prepainted plastic miniature line. I am disappointed that they looted Confrontation to do it. Confrontation needed a rules reset, but it was a good core to build upon. I’m sad they didn’t see it as in their interest to maintain both lines.

    As for whether our hobby needs this sort of thing to compete with other games like World of Warcraft, well, maybe it does. But if what the hobby needs to compete with WoW is to evolve into something I don’t want to play, well, that doesn’t help me much.


    Zac says:

    But if what the hobby needs to compete with WoW is to evolve into something I don’t want to play, well, that doesn’t help me much.

    I’d argue though that it does ultimately help you. Without new players coming into the hobby it dies.


    iratesquirrel says:

    The majority of gamers cut their teeth on 40k or Fantasy. From there other games open up that might appeal more to players, infinity, Warmachine before they decided to be a mass battle game and the previous iteration of Confrontation all appealed to the small scale skirmish player. While things like Flames of War brings similar D6 mechanics with more complexity and historical miniatures. I think more people in the store rolling dice and meeting new people and learning about new games is good times.


    Cadfan says:

    Zac- not necessarily. The question is, how much transfer will there be between people who play prepainted plastic, and people who play painted metal? If the answer is “not much,” then its not just one hobby. It’s two hobbies, and players who enter the world of prepainted plastic do nothing to help preserve the metal miniatures hobby. In that case, prepainted plastic will do about as much for metal miniature wargaming as World of Warcraft does for Dungeons and Dragons. About zilch.


    gavroche says:

    Given the shoddy quality of the average WH40K or WFB paintjobs I encounter in real gaming situations, good prepaints will for many people be a step up & give us better looking games. So 3 cheers for prepaints, even though I’m personally not inclined to buy a lot of them unless they’re repaintable.

    Other than that Cadfan is right, we’re not talking about “the hobby” here, but about 2, or even more separate but closely related hobbies with only a minority of people crossing over. I don’t buy the “big picture” view that tries to tell us mass market companies or easy entry-level stuff are automatically a good thing, or even simply important, for every form of miniature gaming. More often than not they don’t make any impact at all on the more esoteric branches of the gaming community, except to temporarily raise the volume in discussions about “the future of the hobby” ;-)


    Zac says:

    More often than not they don’t make any impact at all on the more esoteric branches of the gaming community

    If they keep your FLGS in business then they do.

    And every kid that wanders into a game store looking for HeroClix is someone that gets into the habit of going to those stores and can eventually be moved into other games.

    I’ve seen that at my local store where the younger 40K gamers have added Hordesmachine to the games they play.

    Without a doubt it makes next to no difference if these people are going to Wal Mart but getting addition traffic into our game stores is a good thing.


    Zac says:

    If the answer is “not much,” then its not just one hobby.

    Not much is still an increase.

    And I think that the divide isn’t so much the games but where they are purchased. Heroscape gamers tend to not be in the same retail ecosystem that other gamers are and I agree that if people are getting AT-43 at Wal Mart then it doesn’t help us.

    I am though, of the opinion, that anything that helps to get new people into stores is ultimately a good thing.


    mathieu says:

    The three most popular sets of pages on TGN are the 40K and AT-43 category pages and any page that relates to the release of the new Confrontation game. Three of the top ten pages at TGN this month are posts about the Confrontation starter and starter set figures. We all appear to cry and moan and about the new Confrontation game and yet we all want information about it. And apparently can’t get enough of it.

    There are a number of reasons why someone could be curious about this prepainted business of Rackham without being in the least interested in it. Stats can tell you pretty much anything depending on what you want to hear :)
    Besides, Rackham’s been aiming at the US market when creating AT43 and now CAoR. Good for them if people on an English speaking forum indeed show interest in those products ;)

    my recent painting has been for [...] pirate gaming so I’m certainly not in the mainstream in any sense.
    Pirates are not mainstream? :p


    Zac says:

    Stats can indeed tell you almost anything you want but in this case I think that traffic of any sort is usually a good indicator of consumer interest. People don’t link to pages that they want to mock… except on Frothers :-)

    And sorry, Pirates are not mainstream gaming. :-) We can dream of a world where they are though ;-)


    Osbad says:

    To this jaded observer the “fantasy/SF toy soldier market” seems to be divided into 3 main focii with varying degrees of overlap.

    These are

    1/ “Traditional” metal, paint-em-yourself games.
    2/ The GW plastic multi-part (rumours abound that GW is going all-plastic soon),
    3/ Clix/CMG/boardgames.

    Rackham’s AT-43 (having played a few games now with my nascent Red Blok) seems to fit more closely into the psychology of the 3rd bracket more closely than the other two, even though on face value it might seem to be a challenge to the 2nd.

    As a 39-year-old gamer with a reasonable eye to quality AT-43 appeals because the models of the walkers look very nicely done, and while the painting and posing of the infantry is “basic”, its good enough for me for the sake of a quick game out the box of an evening. They are reasonably pretty playing pieces and no more.

    And at that level it succeeds.

    My “worries” for the Rackham products are.

    1/ Price. They carry a hefty price tag in the UK (£20 for 6 elite infantry, £7- £10 for a solitary hero) which doesn’t sit well with them fighting against cheap-as-chips clix games for the attention of gamers wallets (typically horrorclix goes for around £5 for 4 models). Also, the hefty price tag makes me think twice about developing my “army” beyond the few units that are needed for the odd game every now and again, as opposed to developing it into something large enough for “serious” sized games and attention.

    2/ Genre. Standard “fantasy” is something that hasn’t taken off in PPP even as a clix game. As such it is a big risk for R to pin their long term hopes on.

    Overall, I think the issue comes down to value for money. R goods carry a hefty price tag (in Europe at least) so are R’s prepaints worthy of consideration as “value for money” to justify that level of investment by the punter? In my view they are treading a very fine line.

    If they could sell their infantry units at around 1/2 to 2/3 of their current European price then I would think they could be a good bet. As things stand though with such high prices, they will only ever attract marginal interest in Europe I believe.

    And as for the issue of “hits” on Rackham topics on TGB; as a previous poster said “interest” doesn’t necessarily equate to “support”. A lot of us are at lest as interested in the development of the “industry” side of things as we are in the possibility of playing the games. Rackham have rocked the boat with ditching their artisitically acclaimed metals in favour of an untried range of prepainted plastic, and a lot of us are fascinated in seeing how it all plays out.


    Osbad says:

    Just as an afterthought. Reinforcement for the idea that AT-43 is competing against “clix” games comes from the inclusion of a playmat in with the starting set. There is not much comment (other than tangentially in the artwork supporting the rulebook, and in the discussion of LoS) about “terrain building” or making gaming tables. While the game adequately plays with it, it plays equally well as a game on a playmat, even though the aesthetic element of the game is less.

    This is something that clearly differentiates it from the “Hobby gaming” side of things that their old metals were about, and classes 1/ and 2/ of my initial analysis go big on.


    gavroche says:

    Zac, FLGS stopped catering to the obscurer tastes years ago ;-)

    Even back in the nineties the local shops over here carried only the major brands. Occasionally they’d give something less well known a try, but as this sort of thing hardly ever works out, fans of less commercially succesful lines would soon have to fall back on mail order. So much for getting kids hooked on Mass Market Game X to cross over in significant numbers to other genres.

    (btw, quoting doesn’t seem to work for me today)


    Zac says:

    Zac, FLGS stopped catering to the obscurer tastes years ago ;-)

    YMMV. One of the local shops here has Black Scorpion figs (Tombstone and pirates) on the shelves and regularly solicits orders for West Wind, Super Figs, AE-WWII, Hasslefree etc. Gets a fair bit of business doing it as well.


    Osbad says:

    Apart from the ‘net, my next most popular source of purchases is independent shows or conventions. There’s no lack of “minority” games at those!


    Zac says:

    btw, quoting doesn’t seem to work for me today

    It was disabled after Gen Con. It wasn’t really very well written and generated a huge load on the server. Especially if there were a lot of comments in a page.

    I’m working on a smarter replacement that won’t cause the same problem.


    amaximus says:

    first of all, i have no problem with pre-paints. i don’t use them because i am a modeller and the cheap plastic bends and the prepaint obscures detail when repainted. my issue is that rahkam’s mission statement use to be ‘to produce the finest quality miniature’s to support the hobby.’ they use to have massive painting and hobby articles in ‘cry havoc’ and they have produced some of the finist mini’s i have ever scene. now, they are turning thier backs on the customers who brought them as far as they have gotten by putting out cheaply done, mass produced, expensive, prepaints. that is frustrating. it is really hard to find mini’s that are not just made for gaming but for modellers as well. now, i heard a rumor that the confrontation lines are going to still have a limited amount of the figs available in metal. if this is true, then i will continue to purchase confrontation mini’s.


    Zac says:

    now, they are turning thier backs on the customers who brought them as far as they have gotten by putting out cheaply done, mass produced, expensive, prepaints. that is frustrating.

    It is but the fact is that Confrontation as it stood wasn’t the success that the company wanted it to be. It sucks that they have made this decision but for a number of reasons they never did have the success with Confrontation in its old incarnation that they could have or wanted.

    No point beating a dead horse.


    mathieu says:

    It is but the fact is that Confrontation as it stood wasn’t the success that the company wanted it to be. It sucks that they have made this decision but for a number of reasons they never did have the success with Confrontation in its old incarnation that they could have or wanted.

    Not arguing about that, but I wonder about the timing of their figuring this lack of success. Was it before they started to dedicate most of their efforts to AT43? Was it before the coffee break when they scribbled a quick version 3.5 of Confrontation that brought more problems than it was supposed to fix? Was it before they released an nth army that they hadn’t planned ahead of time and that they couldn’t support with a regular supply of new releases until it got even remotely on par with the other ones?

    I feel like I could spend the day coming up with reasons why Confrontation wasn’t the success the company wanted it to be… Such a waste of talent truly saddens me.


    Zac says:

    No argument that there are probably a lot of things they could have done better in terms of Confrontation. None of it changes that fact that the game didn’t do well.

    I also would suggest that the miniatures were, for the most part, too darned complicated for a miniature game. I *never* painted any of my figs with the exception of a few Ophidian slaves and I have to say that I always found them far too fussy to paint. Looked great when a skilled painter did some work on them but they usually frightened the heck out of me.

    I painted close to 40 minis for some Weird WWII pulp games in a month but did three Conf figures in three years.


    Chairman Aeon says:

    I think that what we are having is a convergence of the technology that can produce prepaints for an affordable level and lifestyles that don’t allow for a lot of time to paint minis. The first part is self explanitory, the other is not necessarily so. When I was younger and didn’t have the Internet, 188 channel cable, computer/console games, a significant other/child//dog/cat, I had lots of free time to paint my army any way I wanted. That was before GW codified all the Marine chapters and people thought you needed to play an official chapter. But now I have limited time to paint and must admit that I really don;t like painting armies … I like painting miniatures. Rather than buy $100 worth of pewter that sits in boxes and never gets painted I can buy $100 of prepainted plastic and use it the second I tear it out of the box. Sure I could paint better than those Chinese machines, but I’m fooling myself into thinking I’ll do it before pension age. I like painting individual characters for RPGs or personality characters, but my days of painting hoards of metal or plastic are behind me.

    So now I’ll buy some AT-43 minis and some Confrontation prepaints and just play the game rather than buy into the hobby mentality. When I want to paint a cool mini, I’ll do just that … paint one cool mini.

    Iain.


    mikesilk says:

    OSBAD-no need to worry about the price if you are willing to wait a little while. Rackham is having these new pre=paints made in China…for mere pennies…the “bootlegs” will start showing up here on the west coast(Vancouver) within months of the initial release…they will not be painted as well if at all…yayyy! and will cost mere pennies… i too agree that paying $37.50+13% tax for 6 bendy, poorly painted figs is laughable. i gaurantee that the packing they come in costs more.Rackham will not be getting my two-bits for any of the new shlop they are shovelling. M


    CCotD says:

    I find it interesting that people will damn the very game they play….

    I for one applaud Rackham for coming to the aid of the busy gamer. Prepaints are going to be a big part of the gaming sector due to people being insanely busy, at least in the U.S…..

    A recent article in White Dwarf, a writer stated we have a great hobby (painting miniatures) that also has some great rules to allow us to play with our hobby. So GW is clearly pointed at people to paint mini’s first, game second. While Rackham new direction is to aim at gamers first, and if you wish to repaint, go for it.

    And from that comment, and the fact that AT-43 did not do as well as Rackham anticipated on the European continent, I would think that Europeans, with their socialist economies and governments, which favor the workers (which is not a bad thing and I don’t want to start a debate about it) allows for people to have the time to paint mini’s. While in the U.S., with an economy that cares more for the big dogs (ie corporations) most people (like myself) work 50-60 hours a week just to make ends meet. I’d like to make ends meet, so time is a huge factor.

    And for those that think the Mini’s will be as crappy as the ones from WOTC… the AT-43 mini’s are a hell of a lot better than those. So I think that the Confrontation Mini’s will be just as good if not better.


    Zac says:

    the “bootlegs” will start showing up here on the west coast(Vancouver) within months of the initial release…

    I’d be quite surprised to see copies of AT-43 or Confrontation minis.

    HeroClix and all the other Clix games have been made in China for years with no pirated versions being made available i North America.


    nathaniel says:

    I’ve seen them at some of the booths at the Richmond night market. Along with knock-off iPods and anything else you might expect. They’re not marketed or sold as “wargaming miniatures” but just cheap bulk little toy soldiers. I’ve done my share of business with importing from China and if someone is having something made, many factory owners think there must be a market for it and mass produce knock offs for sale by dollar stores, night market booths and whatnot. Even found a couple proprietary designs for a company I used to work for– considering those were one off statues for a corporate client, it was surprising that someone saw fit to counterfeit them, cast them in hard plastic and sell them.

    I did want to revisit one idea though:

    But if what the hobby needs to compete with WoW is to evolve into something I don’t want to play, well, that doesn’t help me much.

    I’d argue though that it does ultimately help you. Without new players coming into the hobby it dies.

    The other poster was talking about the hobby as a whole. If it has to become something that I don’t want to play in order to get new players, it doesn’t help me at all. It’s like saying a new racket that gets people into tennis will help someone no longer interested in tennis. Help them with what? More potential opponents for a game they don’t play?

    I’m taking the opportunity to buy the metal confrontation stuff that is being so deeply discounted at various places. I’m also not at all interested in pre-painted plastics.

    One way or another, it’s a huge gamble for Rackham. They built their company on selling really high quality sculpts that really showed off one’s painting skill. They were high ticket items that really showed off what some might call the “French” style of painting miniatures. Until AT43, their core market was people wanting their gorgeous figures to paint. Now they’re completely changing gears and going with prepaints. Their existing customers aren’t necessarily going to be their future customers. Hopefully for them, they can get enough new people who are interested in pre-paints into it.

    Those of us who like the metal miniatures and skirmish gaming can use them with other rules sets like Ares or Song of Blades and Heroes or some other rules. At one online store, I just grabbed over 20 metal Confrontation miniatures for $50 after shipping. It’ll be a challenge to complete my collection of a given faction before they’re gone, but I’m part way there already.


    Leave a Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.